Bill Nye: Why I'm debating Ancient Alien Theorist George Tsoukalos
Science educator Bill Nye, left, will face off against ancient alien theorist George Tsoukalos in July 5's debate.
February 7th, 2014
01:17 PM ET

Bill Nye: Why I'm debating ancient alien theorist George Tsoukalos

Editor's note: George Tsoukalos, star & producer of hit History Channel TV show Ancient Aliens, will debate Bill Nye "The Science Guy" on Saturday July 5, 2014 at San Francisco's Palace of Fine Arts with CNN's Tom Foreman moderating. The debate will be live-streamed at 7 p.m. ET on, and CNN's "Piers Morgan Live" will host both Tsoukalos and Nye at 9 p.m. Tuesday after the debate. 

Opinion by Bill Nye, Special to CNN

(CNN) – A lot of people have been asking why I accepted Ken Ham’s invitation to debate the origins of life Tuesday night at the Creation Museum in Kentucky.

In short, I decided to participate in the debate because I felt it would draw attention to the importance of science education here in the United States, and with the same convictions, I will continue this push in my upcoming debate with Mr. Tsoukalos.

What keeps this country in the game economically is our ability to innovate. New ideas lead to new technologies, which drive new businesses and new opportunities.

Technological innovations absolutely cannot be created without fundamental understanding of science, the means by which we know nature.

How many young adults and taxpayers use mobile phones? How many of us rely on global navigation systems that use satellites high above the Earth’s surface to find our way around?

Even if you eschew smartphones, you rely on the system to keep airplanes in the sky and ships at sea on their routes. Modern farmers plant seeds in fields with extraordinary precision using information beamed from satellites in space.

MORE ON CNN: Ken Ham: Why I'm Debating Bill Nye 

For the United States to maintain its leadership in technology, we need well-educated science students. To allow our students to come of age without the knowledge gained through the extraordinary scientific insights and diligence of our ancestors would deprive them of understanding of nature and our place in the cosmos.

It would also rob our students of their future. Without scientists and engineers to create new technologies and ways of doing society’s business, other economies in other countries will out-compete the United States and leave our citizens behind.

Tuesday's debate will be about whether Ham’s creation model is viable or useful for describing nature. We cannot use his model to predict the outcome of any experiment, design a tool, cure a disease or describe natural phenomena with mathematics.

These are all things that parents in the United States very much want their children to be able to do; everyone wants his or her kids to have common sense, to be able to reason clearly and to be able to succeed in the world.

The facts and process of science have enabled the United States to lead the world in technology and provide good health for an unprecedented number of our citizens. Science fuels our economy. Without it, our economic engine will slow and eventually stop.

While in many ways, Tsoukalos is a forward thinking man, he makes the dangerous assumption that we, as human beings, are not capable of coming up with innovations in technology on our own. Around the world there are millions of people, who claim these same thoughts, but I believe we can embrace the facts and process of modern science, while enjoying faith. By all accounts, faith can enrich our lives. Many have no conflict with their faith and science. George Tsoukalos is very much like Ken Ham in this regard.

Fundamentally, Tsoukalos' ancient alien theory, much like Ham’s creation model, is not part of modern science. His idea does not enable students to make consistent sense of nature. It provides no means to learn more about the world around us.

So, we’ll see. We’ll see if his theory stands up to traditional scientific inquiry: If a certain claim is true, then we would expect a certain outcome.

I’m excited and very much looking forward to the encounter.

Bill Nye is a science educator and CEO of the Planetary Society. The views expressed in this column belong to Nye.

- CNN Belief Blog

Filed under: Belief • Bible • Creationism • Culture & Science • Culture wars • Evolution • Science

soundoff (2,074 Responses)
  1. E=MC2

    Evolution theory demands an elimination process which forces only the fittest to survive. Mankind survived because he was the fittest species, but thousands of other species survived which refutes that theory.

    February 7, 2014 at 2:58 pm | Report abuse | Reply
    • Sam

      what weak species survived?

      February 7, 2014 at 2:59 pm | Report abuse | Reply
    • Sam

      It doesn't demand it, do a little bit of research. There is a greater possibility of a species continuing with an abnormality that proves advantageous. Its logic!

      February 7, 2014 at 3:09 pm | Report abuse | Reply
      • E=MC2

        Reexamine the Theory of Evolution. That is a good place to start.

        February 7, 2014 at 3:14 pm | Report abuse | Reply
        • Sam

          I think you should absolutely do some more research on the theory of evolution.

          February 7, 2014 at 3:29 pm | Report abuse |
  2. E=MC2

    Love Bill. Adore the man.

    The only rational explanation for the fact that a universe exists is to ascribe a type of intelligence and power way beyond our comprehension who created it.. It is not possible for a sane and reasonable person to view the wonders of life itself to deny the reality of God.

    February 7, 2014 at 2:52 pm | Report abuse | Reply
    • Sam

      So because you find life wonderful it can only be because there is a god? Would this god just happen to be a Christian god by chance? How you can make the leap from life being wonderful to it being created by a god is anybody's guess. You might want to fill in some gaps.

      February 7, 2014 at 2:58 pm | Report abuse | Reply
      • E=MC2

        Try again, if you'd care to. Ask questions pertaining to the subject material.

        February 7, 2014 at 3:00 pm | Report abuse | Reply
        • Sam

          Excuse me? You talk about rationality then start discussing god, how in any way is a god wishing everything into existence rationale? there's no rationality there that's wishful thinking.

          February 7, 2014 at 3:03 pm | Report abuse |
        • E=MC2

          Keep trying if you'd care to.

          February 7, 2014 at 3:18 pm | Report abuse |
    • Sam

      You talk about the universe does that mean there are other worlds out there with humans on? Will we find a copy of the bible there to?

      February 7, 2014 at 3:01 pm | Report abuse | Reply
    • Steve Larson

      That, my friend is the laziest statement I've seen here. I suppose in school you said, "I don't know calculus", and then announced "god gets it, I'm finished". Next I suppose you could imagine getting an 'A' for imaginary effort.

      February 7, 2014 at 3:28 pm | Report abuse | Reply
  3. Salero21

    Creation still remains Created till that day when God the Creator is going to discard the present Creation, throw it all away, burn it, pulverize it and vaporize it until it will be like if never ever existed. Then HE the Creator God will as HE promised, Create a whole NEW Creation. :-D :-D Thanks God for that!!!

    February 7, 2014 at 2:18 pm | Report abuse | Reply
    • Happy Atheist

      Right, because this whole universe is total shlt. So many things out of whack and just crazy like, you know, men marrying men, I mean, who wouldn't destroy the whole universe to fix something so icky, right?...

      February 7, 2014 at 2:28 pm | Report abuse | Reply
  4. Salero21

    Was the educated but deluded Mr. Nye able to prove evolution? NO he was not able to prove anything. However Creation still remains Created till that day when God the Creator is going to discard the present Creation, throw it all away, burn it, pulverize it and vaporize it until it will be like if never ever existed. Then HE the Creator God will as HE promised, Create a whole NEW Creation. :-D :-D Thanks God for that!!!

    February 7, 2014 at 2:07 pm | Report abuse | Reply
    • In Santa we trust

      Yes, creation exists but there's no evidence of a god.
      If you want to learn about evolution to see that has masses of evidence –
      Creation myths have no verifiable evidence.

      February 7, 2014 at 2:11 pm | Report abuse | Reply
      • Salero21

        The ma*sses of Evidence all of the Evidence points to the Fact that atheism and the evolution theory as the source of Creation are both Total stupidity.

        February 7, 2014 at 2:16 pm | Report abuse | Reply
        • The Truth

          The ma*sses of Evidence all of the Evidence points to the Fact that Salero21 and the god theory as the source of Creation are both Total stupidity.

          February 7, 2014 at 2:19 pm | Report abuse |
        • Salero21

          :-D :-D :-D All the Evidence points to the Facts that atheists are extremely hypocritical compulsive and pathological liars. Especially when they pretend to call themselves "The Truth"!! :-D

          February 7, 2014 at 2:22 pm | Report abuse |
        • The Truth

          :-D :-D :-D All the Evidence points to the Facts that Salero21 is an extremely hypocritical compulsive and pathological liar. Especially when she uses other names"!! :-D

          February 7, 2014 at 2:25 pm | Report abuse |
      • Duane Shannon

        If there's a creation; then there's a creator.  That's an a priori statement.

        February 7, 2014 at 2:52 pm | Report abuse | Reply
    • Sam

      Well if you enjoyed and believe everything you heard in the bible wait until you read about Santa clause. prepare to be excited.

      February 7, 2014 at 2:12 pm | Report abuse | Reply
    • Happy Atheist

      "Was the educated"... "Mr. Nye able to prove evolution?" No, but he was able to disprove Genesis...

      February 7, 2014 at 2:17 pm | Report abuse | Reply
  5. Sam

    Religion is such a massive scam how anybody can still believe this nonsense any more is beyond belief. I can understand 200 or 300 years ago when information wasn't as available as today or when there was just no other explanation for things but how modern human beings can believe any of this nonsense with so much information available to them is an embarrassment. You would think just going through a normal american education would give them enough information for them to realize religion is non sense. Look at the oldest civilizations believing in many gods to answer questions. Look at the amount of religions that pre date Catholicism and Christianity alone that share the same stories and same dates and the pagan religions that lead into them again with the same dates. Fortunately the number of religious people is shrinking and hopefully in a hundred years or so it will be completely gone in civilized countries.

    February 7, 2014 at 1:55 pm | Report abuse | Reply
  6. genome852

    We know exactly what makes the car run and what makes the phone work, it's not magic. Nuclear physics has been studied and used to develop nuclear weapons (unfortunately), nuclear power, etc. Microwave ovens use microwaves to cook food, which is EM radiation that can be directly measured. These are scientific facts, and the fact that these things even exist is good enough reason to convince even the most religious nut that the science behind their operation is valid, whether or not they actually understand it.

    Now, belief in God (or gods) where there is no tangible evidence is where everything gets fuzzy. Of course, that's what they call 'faith'. If God(s) descended from the clouds today in front of everyone's eyes, there would be no more arguing. That will not happen. What is eventually going to happen is that the religions of today will eventually end up in a museum, next to statues of Artemis and Apollo, and people will look back through history and wonder how it is possible that in this day and age, we still have people that believe the Earth is flat or was created only 6000 years ago.

    February 7, 2014 at 1:03 pm | Report abuse | Reply
    • Doc Vestibule

      You can't know if your microwave oven would work in ancient Palestine, therefore God.

      February 7, 2014 at 1:09 pm | Report abuse | Reply
      • Duane Shannon

        Wow, you're right, that statement makes no sense.  Thanks for making that crystal clear.

        February 7, 2014 at 2:09 pm | Report abuse | Reply
        • Happy Atheist

          Doc's answer does make it clear for anyone with half a brain. He is stating that Ham's argument against microwaves would likely be that you can't prove that they worked in the past because that would be "historical science" vs the way it works now which is "observational science". Ham has invented a rationale that states "Just because we know how something works right now is no guarantee it has always worked that way." to which I would posit that Ham might want to try putting a loaded gun to his head and pull the trigger to prove his point. Just because science says that pulling the trigger of the gun will ignite the gun powder behind a ball of lead pushing it out of the barrel at a high rate of speed likely destroying any human tissue that gets in the way doesn't in Mr. Ham's logic mean that it has or will always work that way...

          February 7, 2014 at 2:52 pm | Report abuse |
    • callnews

      No, you are wrong, Christ returned after his resurrection for forty days exhibiting many infallable proves before above 500 people. That's the primary historical account of the physician Luke. Above that, I have witnessed, as have countless other missionaries as myself, supernatural and medically confirmed healings, recreative miracles, and natural wonders performed. I hope you have the opportunity to see something beyond the myopic mind of man within your lifetime. No, God is available, and those that seek him find him. Acts 17:27, Hebrews 11:6 (I thought that referencing the words that God said he authored would be sufficient without fear of slander or plagarism. He even stated (by primary source) in His Word that there would be those, who would doubt and ridicule; so it's to be expected.

      February 7, 2014 at 1:53 pm | Report abuse | Reply
      • Happy Atheist

        "exhibiting many infallable proves before above 500 people." of whom none left any record other than less than a handful of supposed direct followers written down decades after the events supposedly happened...

        February 7, 2014 at 1:58 pm | Report abuse | Reply
        • Sam

          Exactly! these religious nuts walk around regurgitating this garbage that they have learned and some don't even read the entire bible or make any effort to look into when it first appeared what evidence there is about who wrote it what religions were saying before it magically appeared. If I came to them with a new bible today and told them to follow you bet your ass they would ask questions. You build a building and sing some songs they follow like lemmings.

          February 7, 2014 at 2:06 pm | Report abuse |
        • Duane Shannon

          Well, for the sake of the witness in myself of God's Word, it's enough for me, but God never stopped doing these miracles, and what I've witnessed is first hand, not stories; not second-hand accounts.  I hope that within your lifetime you find that there's something more than just the fallible mind of man.

          February 7, 2014 at 2:40 pm | Report abuse |
      • Sam

        You can apply your logic to any story that exists any where in the world. Maybe zeus performed those miracles? Maybe Santa did or maybe they were just good things that happened. Your logic is seriously flawed you need to take a very big step back and re evaluate your life.

        February 7, 2014 at 2:00 pm | Report abuse | Reply
        • callnews

          No sir, I've seen the blinded eye restored, and diseases fall off like hot butter. Yes, I believe the accounts of the Bible, but I've tested them myself, and I am a witness of these things, God has done this to confirm His Word. Mark 16:20 I let the Lord evaluate my life, men don't qualify; they didn't make me, nor does history show they have any answers.

          February 7, 2014 at 2:33 pm | Report abuse |
        • Sam

          God is the fallible mind of man, it was created by man for man and continues with the consent of man. Your religion is a book of answers that was invented many years ago to help people understand the world they lived in. All the proof is in your head and doesn't exist anywhere else. The fact that you find something beautiful doesn't prove the existence of any god.

          February 7, 2014 at 2:45 pm | Report abuse |
        • Duane Shannon

          Numbers 23:19  God is not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do it? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?

          February 7, 2014 at 3:29 pm | Report abuse |
        • I wonder

          "I've seen the blinded eye restored, and diseases fall off like hot butter."

          Why aren't these "healers" volunteering in all hospitals and hosp.ices? Selfish bustards... or more likely, despi-cable HOAXERS.

          February 7, 2014 at 3:01 pm | Report abuse |
      • RB

        Good post callnews, thanks.

        February 7, 2014 at 2:22 pm | Report abuse | Reply
        • Sam

          All you have done is fooled yourself into believing you've seen anything. I'm sure you see a picture of jesus in your cherios in the morning as well. There is no bases to your belief its all you and your choice. You could have picked any religion and thanked whatever deity it worshiped.

          February 7, 2014 at 2:41 pm | Report abuse |
  7. Sivick

    FOR SCIENCE!!! seriously, creationists are just an embarrassment to humanity.

    February 7, 2014 at 12:43 pm | Report abuse | Reply
    • callnews

      Ridicule is the is sure act of someone who has nothing to say.

      February 7, 2014 at 1:22 pm | Report abuse | Reply
      • Sam

        Or of somebody who is in absolute disbelief that a person could be so completely wrong. Some people laugh some people ridicule. Lets be honest here if you believe those fictional stories in the bible are the truth then the only thing left to do is laugh at you there's no point trying to help you understand. It would be like trying to explain to a man who is married to a horse why they cant have babies. Just leave them be.

        February 7, 2014 at 1:43 pm | Report abuse | Reply
        • callnews

          Well it's certain you've made your conclusion; so there must be nothing else for you to say. Yes, ridicule delivers that kind of message, and you've done it.

          February 7, 2014 at 2:09 pm | Report abuse |
    • callnews

      Ridicule is the sure act of someone who has nothing to say.

      February 7, 2014 at 1:23 pm | Report abuse | Reply
      • Happy Atheist

        "I think the earth is flat!"

        "I think man faked the moon landing!"

        "I think the earth is only 6000 years old!"

        Ridicule is the sure act of someone who has no other reply to blatant stupidity.

        February 7, 2014 at 3:23 pm | Report abuse | Reply
    • Is the is

      the poor grammar from morons who have no defense of their imaginary fantasy game aka their religion.

      February 7, 2014 at 1:27 pm | Report abuse | Reply
      • Duane Shannon

        The first word in a sentence should be capitalized.

        February 7, 2014 at 2:13 pm | Report abuse | Reply
  8. Chris_Mann

    I'll always side with science but still leave my mind open to other possibilities because we simply don't know. Science isn't as cut and dry as people think. At one point scientists KNEW the earth was the center of the universe. They KNEW the earth was flat. They KNEW the atom was the smallest thing till they split it open and all this crap came out.

    Imagine what they'll know tomorrow.

    February 7, 2014 at 12:33 pm | Report abuse | Reply
    • callnews

      An evolutionist's opinion does not equal science. Science is observable, demonstrated, and repeatable knowledge.

      February 7, 2014 at 1:33 pm | Report abuse | Reply
      • Steve Larson

        Make you a deal? You creationists can have all of the evolutionary gaps, but only if you give them back when their science is understood. You will get a bunch now and not have to do anything (ahhh, the ease of religious belief). Sorry but every week your haul shrinks.
        This way we can ignore you, and you can gloat on your spoils. Deal?

        February 7, 2014 at 1:40 pm | Report abuse | Reply
  9. Reality #2

    It is time to replace all religions with a few rules like "Do No Harm" and convert all houses of "worthless worship" to recreation facilities and parks.

    And for the new members:

    Putting the kibosh on all religion in less than ten seconds: Priceless !!!

    • As far as one knows or can tell, there was no Abraham i.e. the foundations of Judaism, Christianity and Islam are non-existent.

    • As far as one knows or can tell, there was no Moses i.e the pillars of Judaism, Christianity and Islam have no strength of purpose.

    • There was no Gabriel i.e. Islam fails as a religion. Christianity partially fails.

    • There was no Easter i.e. Christianity completely fails as a religion.

    • There was no Moroni i.e. Mormonism is nothing more than a business cult.

    • Sacred/revered cows, monkey gods, castes, reincarnations and therefore Hinduism fails as a religion.

    • Fat Buddhas here, skinny Buddhas there, reincarnated/reborn Buddhas everywhere makes for a no on Buddhism.

    • A constant cycle of reincarnation until enlightenment is reached and belief that various beings (angels?, tinkerbells? etc.) exist that we, as mortals, cannot comprehend makes for a no on Sikhism.

    Added details available upon written request.

    February 7, 2014 at 8:24 am | Report abuse | Reply
  10. Brian

    I love how Ham's evidence is true believers who believe. Laughable

    February 6, 2014 at 8:11 pm | Report abuse | Reply
  11. Manmohan NJ

    Hahaha Neil must be showelling the snow in New york. I thank Science for giving me comforts of life and thus saving me time which I can use in pursuit of God. Imagine if Rat plague killed half of Europe and imagine Polio killed India. As a double edged sword Science can also provide Mad politicians like Hitler tools to destroy earth 10 times in hours. What a waste of thousands of years of evolution if we self destruct. One Jesus and One Buddha can make the entire universe joyous , imagine the joy when we recognize our divinity within one day. It will be heard and echoed throughout the universe I think.

    February 6, 2014 at 6:18 pm | Report abuse | Reply
  12. Mmhmm

    Creationists are such embarrassments. It should be considered child abuse to teach children such lies.

    February 6, 2014 at 5:40 pm | Report abuse | Reply
    • Paul

      What about lies told by evolutionists like "life came from primordial soup?" Would you be fine with those lies?

      February 6, 2014 at 7:44 pm | Report abuse | Reply
      • In Santa we trust

        That actually is not what evolution says; evolution comes into play once life has formed. Primordial soup is a better explanation that a god created itself and then the universe with all life on earth fully-formed. The evidence does not support that.

        February 6, 2014 at 7:59 pm | Report abuse | Reply
        • larsonst

          Hey dude, it wasn't primordial soup, it was mud. Get it straight.

          Believers gonna believe. I believe I'm gonna have a beer.

          February 6, 2014 at 8:31 pm | Report abuse |
        • Paul

          "That actually is not what evolution says"

          I didn't say that's what evolution says. I was implying that is what someone with an naturalistic or materialistic worldview believes. By definitoin, naturalistists can't believe in God because they've already presupposed that he doesn't exist. So they had to create their own fairy tale.

          February 6, 2014 at 9:14 pm | Report abuse |
        • Dandintac


          "...can’t believe in God because they’ve already presupposed that he doesn’t exist. So they had to create their own fairy tale."

          (facepalm) Paul! Come on man! Let's try this. Do you presuppose dragons don't exist? Do you presuppose Ishtar does not exist? Or do you not believe these beings, because there is no evidence for them? Is it fair to say that if you don't believe in Thor, that it is a fairy tale to not believe in him? Is this reasonable?

          As a Naturalist myself, I'm completely willing to consider your God claim. Please define this God and provide some objective, verifiable, repeatable, testable evidence for his existence. This is what we ask for any other claim about the objective reality we live in. Why should we expect any less for your God claim?

          February 6, 2014 at 9:28 pm | Report abuse |
        • Star1

          You want repeatable, testable proof of God? Look around you, your breathing, but do you need to be told you need proof of it? Can't see wind, but we see the tree branches blowing. Can't see gravity, but we are not floating around. God has a name, it is Jehovah and the name itself has meaning. His qualities are wonderfully described as Justice, Power wisdom and above all, Love. He created a beautiful earth that as a Naturalist you see all around you. If you want to get to know him, why not read the Bible for yourself and you can learn all about him through his dealings with mankind and through his son Jesus while he was here on earth. He wants us to know him and love him and explains how to do just that. As we do in real life, you can't say you don't know someone if you don't at least try. He gives us the free will and the choice to know him, it's up to us to decide to do so and after researching so many things, I for one and very happy that I do know him and love him and know he loves me too.

          February 7, 2014 at 2:24 am | Report abuse |
        • Paul

          "As a Naturalist myself, I'm completely willing to consider your God claim. "

          Maybe you should find out what naturalists actually believe.

          February 6, 2014 at 11:00 pm | Report abuse |
        • Dandintac


          If there were hard, repeatable, verifiable, testable evidence for God, that would mean that God is a natural phenomenon that we could observe.

          This is why I asked you to define what you meant by a "god".

          February 7, 2014 at 1:23 am | Report abuse |
  13. SimplyStated

    Mr. Nye,
    Just a reminder, Raymond Vahan Damadian, the inventor of the MR Scanning Machine, has credentials in the field of science AND has a belief in the Bible as the Word of God. No conflict there.

    February 6, 2014 at 3:47 pm | Report abuse | Reply
    • saysame

      A medical doctor who has no scientific theory of creationism is just another guy with an opinion. The world is clearly not 6,000 years old, however much that poor man wants to believe it.

      February 6, 2014 at 6:06 pm | Report abuse | Reply
      • Steve Larson

        Just because a minority of interested/ educated people have contrary ideas doesn't mean we should throw in with them. I'm not saying they are ignorant, just different and in a way I don't agree with. I'm glad the creationists found some allies. I too have friends who were believers but have fallen away. I think that is their path and not a sin.

        February 6, 2014 at 6:14 pm | Report abuse | Reply
      • Star1

        Can it be said 1 more time for the record, for all on this discussion, that the Bible does NOT say the earth itself is only 6,000 years old. It only states that mankind itself, based on the date of Adams death, was created 6,000 years ago. Clearly if anyone reads the first few verses of Genesis that the Earth was here before God created man.. Also, the Bible does not state that all plant life was destroyed by the Flood as Noah used a bird to know when the water was receded enough to leave the Ark and the bird came back with a twig or branch. The book of Genesis is quite clear on the creation of life on earth, even how the Luminaries, such as the sun and the moon were created. it goes on to describe the ceation of plant life and more specifically that animals were created according to their kind, flying creatures, creeping creatures and wild animals according to their kind. The earth is able to sustain life because of how accurately God created it. It is exactly the right distance from the sun, it rotates at the exact way, the water cycle is precise to create the air we breathe. Bill Nye used the word "mystery" more times than explanation. It's not a mystery. There is no need to prove Creation because the evidence of it is all around us, yet after hundreds of years evolution has not been proven as it not only doesn't make sense, but in the words of Bill Nye himself "it's a mystery". That is not a very scientific word.

        February 7, 2014 at 2:12 am | Report abuse | Reply
        • saysame

          Creationists don't agree on the age of the Earth or the age of man. Sort it out with each other before you try bothering the rest of us with that rubbish.

          February 7, 2014 at 9:01 am | Report abuse |
  14. TG

    Bill Nye displays nationalistic interests of the United States rather than the true nature of science, wanting "the United States to lead the world in technology." What is his objective ? Is it to promote science or nationalism ? And of Ken Ham, is he accurate in the literal interpretation of Genesis with regard to the "creative" days at Genesis 1 ? Is the universe, the earth and all life created by God between 5,700 to 10, 000 years ago and preparing the earth for human habitation in six 24 hour days ?

    The Bible does not concur with Ken Ham and his Answers in Genesis organization, flying in the face of scientific fact. Why not ? Accurate science establishes that the universe is billions of years old, if not older. And had Mr Ken Ham examined the Bible carefully, he could of seen that each "creative" day is several thousand years long.

    For example, at Genesis 1:1, it says that "in the beginning God created the heavens and the earth", establishing no time marker as to when "the beginning" started and the earth as unique and set aside as special by God. But it does set a time marker for earth's preparation for life, beginning with "day one" showing diffused light as evidently penetrating the earth's atmosphere and then concluding: "And there was evening and there was morning, first day."(Gen 1:3)

    With each successive day through "day six", they all had closure, saying: "And there was evening and there was morning." However, "day seven" is not seen as having closure. In fact, the apostle Paul says that "day seven" was still ongoing in his time, some 4000 years after the end of "day six".(Heb 4:1-4)

    And when a person comes to understand our Maker, Jehovah God's purpose for the earth (Isa 45:18), of it to be transformed into a paradise for "meek" ones (Matt 5:5), and that we are now some 6,000 years removed from our original forefather, Adam's creation, now living in "the last days" of this corrupt "world" (2 Tim 3:1), and that there is the soon upcoming millennial reign of Jesus Christ, who will see that the earth becomes a paradise for everyone who meets the requirements of being "meek" or teachable by God, resurrecting the majority of the billions that have died over the course of mankind's history (Luke 23:43; Rev 20:13), and thus bringing closure to the "day seven" at its end, then it can be established that each "creative" day is about 7,000 years long and not 24 hours.

    February 6, 2014 at 1:20 pm | Report abuse | Reply
    • igaftr

      You have gone a long way to rationalize belief, but it is still nothing more than belief. There is nothing indicating that there are any gods.

      February 6, 2014 at 2:06 pm | Report abuse | Reply
    • saysame

      Well at least you realize that Young Earth Creationism is crazy. Now just go the extra mile and dismiss the rest of the creationist stuff and you'll be alright. Man is far older than 6,000 years.

      February 6, 2014 at 2:11 pm | Report abuse | Reply
  15. corinthian

    A literal interpretation of The Holy Bible is actually a very recent phenomenon in Western civilization. It surfaced during the challenges presented to the role of the Church during the Age of Enlightenment in the 17th century; it makes strides upon the publication of The Origin of The Species by Charles Darwin in the 19th century; its has gathered force in the 21st century as the role of science in Western civilization is being presented with its own challenges...of still yet unanswered questions.
    Throughout history, the Church has not actually stood in opposition to the advances of science, nor disbelieved in the discoveries made by science: the Church only stood in opposition of the dissemination of knowledge of the advances of science, believing, quite rightly, that the masses would only be confused with such knowledge, with the facts of science and the truth of religion, and would grow conflicted between the two...
    In our present day, the masses are indeed confused and conflicted with the facts and the truth...
    Debates between evolution and creationism are fallacious; intelligent design as well. Science and religion are as opposed to one another as botany to medicine; as grammar to poetry; as walking to soccer. If there had been no concept of family, where would humans have developed the concept of community, society, government and law? Religion answered the questions concerning the origins of humankind and nature and the universe; science expanded the questions as well as the answers. The truths of humankind and nature, however, are different from the fact of humankind and nature. Who, What, When, Where, and How are scientific questions with empirical answers; As to Who For, What For, When and Where Ever, and does not concern itself with such unanswerable questions.

    February 6, 2014 at 3:52 am | Report abuse | Reply
    • alonsoquixote

      The Church (I assume you mean the Roman Catholic Church) has stood in opposition to advances in science when it perceived such advances threatened its grip over the minds of those contributing to its coffers. E.g., when it burned Giordano Bruno at the stake for "the doctrine of the infinite universe and the innumerable worlds" and his beliefs "on the movement of the earth" and put Galileo on trial for heresy for advocating heliocentrism. It was protecting itself.

      Though there have been other instances where clerics have contributed greatly to the advance of science. Today, the Catholic Church, like many Protestant churches, e.g., the United Methodist Church, supports evolutionary theory finding no conflict with it and the teachings of the Church. But, unfortunately, there are other fundamentalist Protestant denominations and some Christians even in denominations that accept evolutionary theory that still deny all scientific evidence that they believe conflicts with the Genesis creation and flood myths.

      When you say "Religion answered the questions concerning the origins of humankind and nature and the universe" it provided answers to important questions humans had regarding where they came from, why devastating natural calamities sometimes struck, etc. But those answers came from the imagination of storytellers rather than an understanding of the natural world. The answers may have offered some comfort when scientific understanding was lacking, but continuing to cling to them can hamper the acquisition of knowledge about how the workings of the universe as we see in the case of individuals such as Ken Ham.

      February 6, 2014 at 8:07 am | Report abuse | Reply
  16. Danz

    Bill was good. Neil deGrasse Tyson would have wreaked havoc!

    That's my scientific prediction based on observations from the past.

    February 6, 2014 at 3:30 am | Report abuse | Reply
    • Dandintac

      I agree. Tyson would have mopped the floor with Ham. Especially if he was fired up.

      February 6, 2014 at 9:00 pm | Report abuse | Reply
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Post a comment


CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.

About this blog

The CNN Belief Blog covers the faith angles of the day's biggest stories, from breaking news to politics to entertainment, fostering a global conversation about the role of religion and belief in readers' lives. It's edited by CNN's Daniel Burke and Eric Marrapodi with daily contributions from CNN's worldwide newsgathering team and frequent posts from religion scholar and author Stephen Prothero.